Eviction on the day of induction – G4S

it emerged on Monday that a pregnant asylum seeker had been evicted on the day that her baby was induced; that the housing subcontractor, Target, knew she was set to give birth on that day; and that G4S (wouldn’t you know it), the main contractor, had an excuse waiting ready. “Neither G4S nor our subcontractors can remove an individual from their housing without the prior approval of UKBA” (the UK Border Agency).

Since March this year, £1.7bn worth of UKBA work has been subcontracted out to three companies, G4S, Serco and Clearel. They have more power over the conditions of asylum seekers than any local authority, and yet no accountability – ask G4S why they would move a woman on the day she was having a baby, or why they would house mothers and babies, three-to-a-room, in a hostel that smells like a cross between a prison and a chip shop, and they have the private contractors’ mantra. “We wouldn’t do it if UKBA hadn’t said it was OK. We’re just following orders.”

Jomast is another big private landlord with a hostel in Stockton-on-Tees that represents exactly what’s wrong with the way asylum housing is being run. If you were to conceive of a recipe for post-natal depression, this place would be it – it’s cramped and stuffy, there’s almost always a baby crying, when there isn’t you wish there was, because in the quiet you can hear someone’s high, hacking cough. Thirty-two women live here with 38 children. “Khloe has diarrhoea and is vomiting; the whole floor has diarrhoea and is vomiting. An ambulance comes to the building every week,” 30-year-old Chawada Matiwala told me. Originally from Zimbabwe, Matiwala has a first class degree in social science. “I worked in housing, I know this isn’t right. I know how bad this is for my daughter.”

Pete Widlinksi, from the North of England Refugee Service, remembers a Red Cross worker going round, asking a mother how often her child felt well. “She said in a year, her child had only had one month without a cold or a bug.” The mechanics of life would make you cry with frustration – trying to get through three fire doors carrying a baby and a hot pan, having to get to the doctor when your voucher support doesn’t cover any travel – but there are details of control, too, that seem almost sinister.

If you spend more than 14 nights away in a six-month period, you are deemed not to need support, and your money is withdrawn. Given the dispersal system, friendships are often far flung, and this makes it impossible to maintain them. They have no money, no space, no childcare, no right to work, almost no access to civic life (Surestart is a bright spot, and everybody mentions it). Matiwala’s neighbour, who speaks no English, has an 11-month old and is pregnant. “Sometimes you hear her in her room, screaming at the child. She’s going ballistic in there, the confinement is unbearable.”

Catherine Tshezi, now 40, moved out of the hostel six months ago, having been moved in when her baby, Jordan, was 15 days old. “A couple of days before I gave birth, that’s when my support was terminated. I was induced not knowing where I would live when I came out.” Again, she had no contacts in the area. “It was total displacement. I did try reading the legislation, just to understand the system, and I couldn’t see how it was reasonable.”

 

The housing is for people awaiting a decision on their asylum claim – it’s not detention, and yet that’s what it feels like. Pete is peeled away from our group and made to sit in the office, where Stephen Monk, the son of Jomast’s owner, sends him a fax. It’s a testimonial from another resident, Miss Bipana Malla, stating: “The person who make totally wrong complain against the staffs is not right. That’s totally wrong. The one who make wrong complain about the staffs they are themselves walking around without cloth on their body”.

We’d heard no complaints about the staff, we were only there to look at the conditions. The fax reached this Stalinist conclusion: “It is up to us to give respect for all the support that this company has provided us.”

The funny thing about the north-east is how many people will tell you that they are renowned for welcoming strangers. Sheffield is officially a City of Sanctuary. Teesside raised £40,000 last year, and much more in food, for a very niche local charity purely for asylum seekers in hardship.

The asylum process has never been pleasant, but when local authorities had most of the border agency contracts, at least they didn’t use hostels and tended to take into account, when evicting people, whether or not they were in labour at the time. John Grayson, from the South Yorkshire Migration and Asylum Action Group, was the one who first told me about the hostel: “I’ve been doing this a long time as a volunteer but even I’m getting stressed out by what I’m seeing. I thought that had died out with Cathy Come Home, putting mothers and tiny children in prison.”

It is estimated that the UKBA has saved 13% on these contracts, though commercial confidentiality means that that figure is unconfirmed. It’s hard to put a number on how much conditions have worsened, but they have dropped below the level of human decency.

 

Asylum seekers

Chawada Matiwala with her daughter at a hostel for asylum-seeking mothers and children in Stockton. Photograph: Christopher Thomond

Housing provided to asylum seeker families is unfit for children, a Parliamentary inquiry has been told.

Two single mothers housed in the north-East told a cross-party group of MPs and Peers that the state of their accommodation, frequent moves and the attitude of the private housing providers left them feeling degraded and depressed.

The women were giving evidence to an inquiry examining whether the Home Secretary’s statutory duty to safeguard and promote children’s welfare, which came into force in 2009, is being met.

The housing in the North-east is provided by the security company G4S, which won two of the six lucrative UK Border Agency contracts to house asylum seekers earlier this year.

The Independent today revealed that G4S had failed to meet its contractual obligation to re-house asylum seekers in Yorkshire by 12 November, and people had been rushed into squalid properties as the deadline approached.

Both young women described frequent incidents of workmen from the local housing provider Jomast – which G4S sub-contracts – letting themselves in to flats unannounced, without prior warning.

Cha Matty, 31, from Zimbabwe, was dispersed from London to an asylum seekers hostel for mothers and babies last year – two weeks before she gave birth to her daughter.

“There are many occasions where male staff have peaked at me in the bathroom and bedroom, they just barge in, they don’t respect you.

“G4S promised us in a meeting five months ago that they would get rid of this hostel, but we are still there. 30 women and 38 children all living in single rooms, with no space for my daughter to walk or play,” she told The Independent.

She has asked several times for a stair guard to be installed since her daughter started to crawl because it is “an accident waiting to happen”, the inquiry heard.

Jane, 31, from Russia, has just moved her six-year-old son into his third school after she was unexpectedly moved from a two bedroom flat to a one bedroom on the grounds it was too big for them.

“My child is growing up, he feels what I feel, he experiences what I experience… Families should not be constantly moved to different towns and cities; it extremely affects education and mental health.”

She added: “I understand that Jomast has to do repairs, but they don’t knock the door, they have keys so they just enter the property, they absolutely ignore people living there… this has happened to me so many times… it is disgusting.”

Matthew Reed, chief executive of The Children’s Society which is supporting the inquiry, said these experiences were not uncommon.

“We work with children and families in the asylum system every day who are living in terrible conditions. This very often has a huge impact on their health and welfare… many have fled violence and persecution in their own country.”

Stephen Monk from Jomast said the hostel in Stockton-on-Tees was fully compliant with standards, inspected regularly and there was sufficient space for children to play.

He added: “Key workers do not enter accommodation without reasonable warning. All staff have enhanced CRB checks and are fully trained.”

A G4S spokesman said it would look into all the individual complaints and many customers could expect to see improvements in their accommodation in the coming weeks as historic housing stocks were reviewed.

The inquiry’s report will be published early next year.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/asylum-seeker-houses-unfit-for-children-8335931.html

 

Read more http://www.opendemocracy.net/ourkingdom/john-grayson/g4s-and-friends-exploit-mother-and-baby-market

http://womenforrefugeewomen.wordpress.com/2012/12/17/chawadas-christmas/

Advertisements

Posted on 18/12/2012, in politics and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 2 Comments.

  1. Okay – maybe I don’t understand the UK legal system, but why the HECK is G4S still in business? Their Olympic debacle ALONE should’ve put them out of business. Yes, I understand there are other companies doing this crap, but I’m personally shocked to see that G4S is even still in business. I wouldn’t hire them to clean up after my DOG!

  2. Outstanding information once again! I am looking forward for your next post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: